Sequential vs Monadic design
Use these designs when participants need to evaluate multiple concepts, designs, ads, products, or other stimuli.
Monadic Design
In a monadic design, each participant evaluates one concept only.
Example
You want to test three advertising concepts:
- Concept A
- Concept B
- Concept C
You can create three groups:
- Group A → Concept A
- Group B → Concept B
- Group C → Concept C
Each participant is assigned to one group and sees only that concept.
When should I use monadic?
Use monadic when:
- You want an independent evaluation of each concept.
- You don't want participants comparing concepts directly.
- Seeing one concept could influence their response to another.
- You want to understand how each concept performs on its own.
Setting up a monadic design in Decode
Use Group & Randomization to distribute participants across the relevant groups.
You can also use Screener responses and Study Logic when participants need to be routed to a specific group based on their responses.
For example:
Current customers → Group A
Competitor customers → Group B
Sequential Design
In a sequential design, each participant evaluates multiple concepts one after another.
Example
You have three concepts:
Participant 1: A → C → B
Participant 2: B → A → C
Participant 3: C → B → A
Each participant sees all three concepts, but the order is randomized.
When should I use sequential?
Use sequential when:
- You want each participant to evaluate multiple concepts.
- You want to make more efficient use of your sample.
- You want to compare multiple concepts within the same participant.
Setting up a sequential design in Decode
Use Group & Randomization to control and randomize the order in which concepts are presented.
If the participant's experience should depend on their screener responses, use Screener + Study Logic to route them to the appropriate experience.
Keep order effects in mind
The order in which concepts are shown can influence participant responses.
To reduce this:
- Randomize the order of concepts.
- Keep exposure consistent.
- Avoid showing too many concepts in one session.
- Consider participant fatigue.
Monadic vs. Sequential
| Monadic | Sequential | |
|---|---|---|
| Concepts each participant sees | One | Multiple |
| Main purpose | Independent evaluation | Evaluate multiple concepts |
| Decode setup | Group & Randomization / Study Logic | Group & Randomization |
| Main benefit | Reduces cross-concept influence | Makes efficient use of participants |
| Main consideration | Requires participants across groups | Order effects and fatigue |
Rule of thumb
Want each participant to evaluate one concept independently? → Monadic
Want each participant to evaluate multiple concepts? → Sequential